High Court calls for strengthening oversight of sworn-in jobs

The High Court has ruled that state policies and procedures surrounding oath-taking for public positions must be strengthened, emphasizing the importance of accountability, legal clarity, and public trust in state institutions.

The ruling was issued today in connection with an appeal concerning a Special Constabulary officer who was arrested in GDh. Thinadhoo last month after police reportedly discovered vapes and suspected drug paraphernalia during a search of his residence. The island court had ordered his release, but the Prosecutor General's Office appealed the decision to the High Court.

During the High Court hearing, the officer claimed he had attended the swearing-in ceremony but did not actually take the oath, despite signing his appointment letter. This statement prompted extensive questioning from the judges.

In its ruling, the High Court stated that the officer’s comments reflected a misunderstanding of the seriousness of oath-taking, which should not be treated lightly. The court highlighted the need for clear legal consequences tied to the signing of oaths and affidavits for positions that legally require them.

"The required oath and the legal consequences of signing the oath affidavit demand a strengthening of state policies and procedures. This is essential for ensuring accountability in public office and maintaining public confidence in the legal system and the state," the judgment read.

The case was presided over by a three-judge panel, which unanimously ruled that the decision by the lower court to release the officer was incorrect. The High Court also directed that a decision on his detention must be made within two days.

Police officer in vape case claims he never took oath